Association Related
Sugar Valley Lakes
Peoples Party for Change at SUGAR VALLEY LAKES and HIDDEN VALLEY LAKE
Vote People’s Party for Change-Let’s put lakes and roads FIRST for a while!
To download, print and mail your voting Proxy for the 2009 Election of Directors! Click Here.
Over the past 8 years our Homes Association's financial condition has experienced constant erosion and recently has begun spiraling to new lows. The Association's net worth (assets - liabilities) went from a surplus of $55,000 in December 2000 to a new low of --Negative ($81,945) as of a October 31 2008 Association report, (not counting an item called inventory of $86,615 reported on the balance sheet). During the same time, dues and assessments dropped from $410,419 to approximately $397,000 this year. This is in spite of the fact that annual assessments have increased by $28 for each lot per member. Over the same time period, the roads, lakes, and other common properties have been neglected and are in the worst condition ever. Members should realize that the current conditions are due to the policies, priorities, and practices of the Board of Directors. It is the Board who determines how our Association is run. It is the membership who determines who is elected the Board.
A exciting move is underway to drastically change how our Homes Association is managed. It is a move to begin conducting Association business like a homes association and not a country club or a city as it has been over the past eight years. To make such a change, the 3 vacant board positions will need to be filled with new leadership that has much different priorities than the present board and the board’s of the past 15 years. A major CHANGE is needed to prevent the Association from the inevitable demise that will surely occur if it continues down its current path. A new initiative for the 2009 election has been established. This initiative is to change the composition of the Board of Directors in order to change the way the Association is managed. Three members have agreed to a common set of principles, values, and assumptions and have pledged to a common election platform. The initiative is known as the Peoples Party for Change. The Peoples Party candidates for 3 vacant board positions, two at Sugar Valley and 1 at Hidden Valley are:
Joe Price(SV), Bill Gooderl(SV write-in), and Robert Lowe(HV).
Please Note: Due to a conflict Mr. Bill Gooderl was chosen and has agreed to participate as a Peoples Party Candidate. His name was not on the Official ballot mailed to members. To vote for Mr. Gooderl, please use the write-in space provided on the ballot for or send a proxy to Mr. Jow Price and he will vote for Mr. Gooderl.
We ask all members to get involved with this election and vote for the Peoples Party candidates for change. This may be the only time in several years that 3 board positions will be elected. If you don't vote, you can rest assured that the Association business in the coming year will be business as usual.
Here is our second draft of a Peoples Party Platform. We need your comments, and your votes! Keep in mind that some of these initiatives will take some time to implement. Just as it takes time to slow down a heavy freight train, some activities that are happening in this massive organization will be difficult to stop immediately without serious consequences.
Assumptions, Principles and Values from which future policies and actions will be based
Assumptions
- The Association must have the financial support (assessments) of its very large number non-permanent residents to survive. The Association cannot continue to exist with only the assessments of the permanent residents.
- Property owners must get sufficient value from their assessments or they will discontinue paying them, especially during these bad economic times.
- A large number of property owners have discontinued paying assessments because they are discontented with the way their money has been used in the past.
- All common areas and facilities must be maintained or private property values will decline.
- As private property values decline, more members who own unimproved lots will discontinue paying assessments
- As assessments increase, more members will discontinue paying them.
- All members should benefit equally from their membership
- All members should be treated equally when Bylaws and Covenants are enforced
- No real estate should be owned by the Association's that is not for the use and enjoyment of all members
- All property owners must be treated with respect
- The Covenants and Bylaws must not be violated by the Association that was created to enforce them
- Regulations made by the Association must not conflict with the Covenants
Highlights
- Annual Assessments kept at current levels for 2009 and reduced if possible for future years.
- All member fees eliminated
- Administrative expenses greatly reduced from current high % of Assessments
- Maintenance expenses will be increased for lake, roads and recreational areas
- Personal services to members discontinued
- Daily Money flow greatly reduced or eliminated
- External Auditors recommendations for double-entry accounting for assessment revenues to be followed
- Monthly balance sheet and profit/loss statements available for publication on websites supporting the community
- Annual balance sheet and profit-loss statement published with annual newsletter and available to websites supporting the community
- Improve bylaws to re-instate member rights
Annual Assessments kept at current levels for 2009 and reduced if
possible for future years.
The people’s party pledges to keep the maximum Annual Assessments at
current levels for 2009. Almost yearly since 2002, the Association's
leaders have put an
assessment increase to a vote of the membership. Each time the membership has voted against the increase, yet
during that same period, the Association management has increased our annual
assessments from $110 in 2000 to $138 in 2008. In 2004 the Association
improperly assessed the membership a $42 increase. Two of the Peoples
Party candidates filed a lawsuit claiming the Association had violated
the Covenants and the Association settled that claim by agreeing to
refund the nearly $80,000 improperly levied. The letter that accompanied
the refund stated that the Board had refunded the assessments because
their lawyer said the election was improper. The leadership
mentioned nothing about the lawsuit and did not give any explanation why
it took 11 months to refund the assessments. The Peoples party
candidates were serious about protecting your rights then and we will be
equally serious about keeping future assessments to a minimum.
Member Fees Eliminated
The People’s Party will eliminate member’s use fees for using the common
areas. The “old timers” (original members) will tell you that everything
used to be free at Sugar Valley. There were no golfing fees, no green
fees, no trail fees, no boating fees, no ATV fees-no fees whatsoever.
That’s the way it is supposed to be. All members have an easement to use
the common properties. This easement is a right of membership. An
easement is a right to use real property of another person or
organization. The only prerequisite is that the member’s dues are paid.
The Association only has the right to charge fees is if the common
properties have to be mortgaged-this is stated in the covenants. But
somewhere in the past, the Association's leaders began misleading the membership
and started charging to use the golf course. When that worked, these
Board members
started charging other fees. If we let this practice continue, there
will be a fee for every thing-just like in a country club. The Peoples
Party will stop these illegal fees and make the Association run like a
Homes Association again. Please note: There are certain charges that
will continue on a cost recovery basis. Campground use of electricity
and water, and golf cart rentals, annual rental of golf shed will
continue. In the long run, an evaluation will be made to determine
the feasibility of continuing certain rental operations.
New Business Model
Most of you are probably wondering how we plan to keep assessments low
and stop illegally charging use fees for the property you have an
easement to use already. This strategy is totally contrary to the
proven failed business model that has been used over the past 10 years.
That faulted strategy has been to increase assessments and use fees and
to minimize expenses by neglecting the amenities that don't produce
revenue. Some of the prior leaders are already promoting that our(so far
unpublished) plan is doomed to failure. The new business model is based
on running the Association like a homes association instead of a local
country club.
The New Business Model is based on:
- Increased percentage of members paying assessments
- Increased non-member revenue
- Reduced Administrative expenses
- Eliminated Personal Services
Increased percentage of members paying assessments
The percentage of lots with no assessment revenue is at an all time
high. The Association owns a large number of lots, some purchased at tax
sales, some taken from members in consideration for calling off
collection agencies for past-due assessments, and some donated by
members because the assessments exceeded their property value. In some
cases, the association has been able to sell a few of these lots, but
with lots selling at the county tax foreclosure sales for $1, it is hard
to sell many lots. These lots do not bring in any assessment
revenue. In fact, each year, since these lots are not for the common
enjoyment of the community are taxed by the county.
In addition to the association-owned lots, more and more people have
stopped paying assessments. The root cause for this phenomenon is that
people are not getting any value from their assessments. Some people
stopped paying in protest for not seeing any improvements in the common
properties that they value. Most of these people don't use the golf
course but like to camp, fish, boat and other activities that require
the bath houses and parks and lakes to be maintained. I have
talked to some people who just quit paying because they are harassed
into removing their camper from their lake lot for five (5) months
out of the year. According to some accounts, approximately 28-percent of
the lots are not generating any assessment revenue. Our goal is to
significantly increase the percentage of members who pay their
assessments. As one current board member recently stated, if everyone
paid their assessments, we wouldn't be having any financial problems.
That same board member seems intent to continue raising the assessment
amount and not the percentage of those who pay.
An integral part of this strategy is to increase the percentage of the budget to maintain all the common properties and amenities. Most of the roads have been neglected, even after the 1990 assessments were increased from $75 to $100 with promises the new money would be spent on the roads. Most of the recreation areas are overgrown with timber and weeks and people don't even know where they are. These areas should be available for camping, family activities and other use by the membership. the number of bath houses and restrooms is too low with a membership as large as ours. With a large number of non-residents who need these amenities to enjoy their weekend trip or weeklong camping vacation, having too few resources just causes a self-thinning effect on the number who use the community. It also has a self-thinning effect on the assessments being paid.
Increased non-member revenue
I have attended board meetings where, in the member forum, some people ask why we don't open up some of the amenities to non-members to raise more money. The Boards' response is generally that we are a private development and the Covenants and Bylaws don't permit it. But, at the same time these board members are contradicting their own formal statements on a small scale in the back office. The local high school kids for example, are allowed a school-membership to use the golf course. (By the way, we believe this policy is good for the community and thus the association). In another example, several times during the summer, primarily on weekends, the golf course is closed to the members so that privately organized groups can host golf tournaments and raise money for their own cause. There are a few wedding receptions and other activities.
The Peoples Party believes this already tried model needs to be modified and expanded to really grow some real revenue. There are several school districts who would be a good source of revenue for area events using our facilities. Many of these events could be scheduled during the week-days so that fewer members would be affected. In many cases the facilities could be shared (not closed to the membership). The school age memberships could be expanded to more surrounding communities and additional school districts could be invited to rent the facilities. The clubhouse could be scheduled year-around for family and group activities when not being used by members for their own family reunions, parties and gatherings. There are many possibilities to use our valuable resources to increase non-member revenue.
Administrative Expenses Reduced
We also need to lower the
administrative expenses. If you look at the annual profit and loss
statements
will note that the administrative expenses are very high. The reason is that the
Association has too many employees whose only role is keeping the
records, managing the business activities, and performing other
functions of an administrative nature. It takes a lot of people to run a
country club, but only a few to run a Homes Association. The covenants
for Assessments specifically state that our assessments are to be used
solely for the maintenance and improvement of the common properties
including the management of this purpose. As an example, this year (year
to date) the association spent less that 2% of the revenue for gravel
for our much neglected roads while reportedly total salaries and
benefits for employees took 38% of total income. Now, even a voodoo
mathematician can determine that 60% of the other money went to some
other expense category. With such a low expense for gravel, one
would not think the maintenance expense would be where this money is
going.
Personal services to members discontinued
The People’s party will discontinue providing personal services to a few
members at the expense of all members. These personal services include
pumping the septic holding tanks on a year around basis for many of the
residents. These services are
costing the entire membership, who mostly does not get any benefit of
these services. The use of employees and equipment, and the cost of
managing, recordkeeping, and administering these personal services is
costing the membership a good deal of money. This is one of the reasons
the administrative costs are so high. Also, when the staff is directly
performing these services or keeping records or managing the activities,
they are not maintaining the common properties for the benefit of all
members. The Peoples party believes that the Septic Tank pumping
operation needs to be moved to an entire separate corporation that is
managed by its own staff, with all expenses and revenues shifted to that
corporation. None of our assessment dollars would be spent either
directly or indirectly on providing this outside maintenance. Other personal services such as gravel hauling would be
discontinued. There are people in town that will do that for a fee. We
need our employees maintaining the common properties-all year. We need
our people and equipment using our resources to improve the common
properties that can benefit all members. That is the role of a good
Homes Association.
Other initiatives being considered
The Peoples Party will eliminate or greatly reduce the DAILY MONEY FLOW
that is occurring.
The members and their guests are constantly handing
over money in the form of cash, checks and credit cards to the
Association employees. The cost of this money flow is enormous. First,
some of this money never makes it to the Association bank account. As
early as just two years ago, one employee was caught embezzling nearly
$4000. About 10 years ago, according to a reliable source another former
worker stole enough money to buy a home in Linn County. Who
knows how much additional money was drained by past employees who were
never caught. Now, in order to stop this activity, the Association has
to hire additional accountants and go through an enormous number of
checks and balances to help reduce the lost cash. Then, there is he cost
of hiring the employees to take in the money in the first place. One
could ask, with all the non-assessment revenue taken in last year, why
was there a deficit. The answer is of course, it cost the Association
more money to take in and account for the money than was taken from the
members and their guests.
The daily money flow can be eliminated by discontinuing or reducing the activities
that cause so much money to exchange hands. The Assessments can be
collected by an independent agency and most of this money will be taken
between January and March and deposited into the bank. The extra fees
collected from members will be eliminated. This would include the boat
registration fees, the green and trail fees for the golf course, the
beach use fees the current board is talking about will not be approved.
The ATV fees will be stopped. In short, all of these fees which should
be a part of our membership will be abolished.
External Auditors recommendations for double-entry accounting to be followed
Each year for the several years, the By-law mandated External Audit
occurs (with some exceptions when the Board has decided to forgo the
costs)
Each year when an audit does occur, the Board is presented the results
of the audit, including a letter to management. Most members never hear
much about this audit or the management letter. The membership has a
right to see the results, especially the recommendations for
improvement. On common recurring recommendation is that the Association
use a double entry accounting method for the Assessment revenues. The
main problem is that there is no lot-by-lot accounting in the general
ledger system for our assessments. The covenants dictate that every
year, the Board members declare assessments for the coming year. On the
date set by the board, the member who then owes the assessments is
personally responsible for paying the assessments. The association is
responsible for maintaining a list of the lot owners at the date the
assessments are set. At that time a receivable account for that person
should be setup in the accounting system. When the payment is
subsequently received from that person, their general ledger account
should be credited with the amount paid. If the lot is subsequently
sold, the balance is still due from the member who was assessed, not the
new owner. The Association has never followed this Covenant and has
never used their double entry accounting system in this manner. Each
year, (unless the auditors have given up), this practice is written up
by the external audit. Each year, the Board members ignore the audit.
Each year, the exception is concealed from the membership. That will
change when the Peoples Party is elected to the Board. To begin with,
the new board will follow the covenant for assessments is setting the
assessment amount and date. Then a way will be devised to utilize the
accounting system to correctly record the payments from the members.
There should be no reason why the records can’t be properly maintained.
Perhaps if the bookkeepers weren’t so busy keeping and auditing records
for all the other non-essential activities, daily money flow, and
personal services, they could better maintain the assessment accounts.
Monthly balance sheet published on website
There is no reason the Association’s Accounting balance sheet and profit
and loss summary cannot be published on any of the three websites that
property owners rely on for information. This will occur if the peoples
party candidates are elected.
Annual balance sheet and profit-loss statement published with annual
newsletter
There is no reason the Association’s yearly accounting balance sheet and profit and loss summary cannot be published in the annual newsletter fro all members to view. It should also be publishes on any or all of the three websites that property owners rely on for information.
To be updated and continued . . . please stay tuned and e-mail cour comments
and recommendations